The power equation has a very
common thread among the power aspirations—you want to be the real controller of
affairs; you have an impulse against sharing it with centralization-diluting people,
groups and institutions. There is hardly any chance to come across a politician
who doesn’t want all-out power in his own hands. The only deciding factor is to
what extent he can manage it. So we can safely say that all politicians are
basically cult aspirants. From this point, Modi is justified in trying to rise
above his own party and the parent organization, the RSS. But the trends after
two phases of parliamentary elections give rise to a pertinent question: Is
cult politics (which can be safely called electoral autocracy) feasible in
India?
To seek answer to this question,
we have to first find out where it’s practical and effective to operate the politics
of cult. Of course the communist countries come very close to set up a system
that easily digests the mythical cult of an individual because systematically
the entire society is cut in the same fabric, doing away with socio-economic
and religious diversities. In a beautifully manicured field, it’s very easy for
one sturdy sunflower to stand in the middle and function as the all-go point of
authority. It is also possible in the mono-religious, theocratic societies,
predominantly Muslim countries for example. There is a firm, homogenous hold of
faith over the people and in this evenly leveled society an individual can easily
rise above and rule over the rest.
However, cult formation in a
massively varied society like India is a big challenge. There are so many
regional disparities, economic variations, caste categories and religions. It’s
an exciting jungle of different plants and trees having varying heights. How
far you will go to be at the same height from all of them? You cannot serve as
a common denominator to all of them as a cult figure unless you use brute force
or do something as drastic as changing the constitution itself, both of which
are virtually impossibilities in the Indian set up. There are so many
centrifugal forces always pulling the power away from the center. You can have
some moments of a total grasp but things will slip out of hand because India is
an exotic Pandora box. And that’s where the uniqueness of this great country
lies. We love our freedom of not being perfect. We are a bouquet of colors
which is so appealing to this rapidly mono-coloring world. We are an exotic
chaos which is far more interesting than any order. We have earned our freedom
after centuries of subjugation and we would very much like to keep enjoying the
spirit of freedom including the freedom of expression.
You simply cannot rise above history
by belittling past greats like Gandhi and Nehru. They had their own cult
following but it was showered upon them by the people willingly and out of
respect and affection. It wasn’t a product of their cult-formation direct endeavor.
It was just an outcome of their sincere efforts for the welfare of their
motherland.
How big and effective a cult you
can erect in such a diversified society as India depends on your personal
capacity. And Modi has been the most effective and capable person since Nehru
and Indira to rise above the hordes of power-diluting factors and rule as a
supreme authority. Beyond judgments, I see it as a mark of his capabilities,
his brilliant oratory and the spirit of keeping an unrelenting hold on all those
around him. But in such a tight-gripped system in a democracy, there will
always be tension among those whose powers have been diluted. They will look up
to you with anxiety because you are keeping their loyalty by force. To maintain
an unchallenged authority as the central figure it requires frequent purges
like in communist and theocratic countries. But it isn’t possible to do so in
its direct form in a democracy and that too the largest democracy which is
always under the scanning radar of the world because what happens here has a
direct bearing on the global democratic machinery. Yes the indirect tools of
intimidation like ED, CBI, IT and other authorities work to an extent by
keeping the opponents (both within and outside) cut down to a manageable size.
But it is a deterrent only. You can just control your opponents till a point,
not do away with them altogether.
One can feel a strong undercurrent
of change in India after the two phases of elections. There is oversaturation with
the brand Modi in people’s psyche. If you hear Modi-Modi one billion times, of
course there will be a Modi fatigue. You lose that charm over people’s fancying
spirits.
I think almost hundred percent
media control is counterproductive. It discards the basic principle of safety
valve. Freshness and newness are the basic elements of news that keep people
glued to the news channels. The electronic media is so saturated with Modi
narrative that it turned very boring for the common masses. Of course the diehard
zealots would love watching it but they number very less. Most of the people
would at the most like a leader instead of turning blind followers.
In the absence of a safety valve
type dissenting outlet in the mainstream media, the journalists and critics who
had been kicked out of the mainstream media platforms found their outlets
through numerous social media platforms including YouTube channels, which have
been highly effective in presenting a different aspect of the situation. People
liked these interesting, discordant voices for their varying opinions. They had
the element of fresh news. No wonder these platforms will have a decisive role
in the current elections. Cheap internet plans allow the people to stay glued
to their social media choices, who is even bothered about the television.
In his place I would have kept
the ratio of 75:25 in the mainstream media—75 percent my narrative and 25
percent for the opposing voices. It would have acted like a safety valve and so
many tiny punctures in the tube won’t have surfaced in the form of mushrooming
social media channels. Of course Modi government has its own mushroom sprouts
in social media as well but their content has been a copy of what people see on
the television, so that also lost interest and hence viewership.
All in all it will be a very
interesting election during the next phases and Modi, the master he is of our
emotions, will of course try to raise a blizzard, trying to flare passion and bring
out the critically opinioned and imbalanced persona in us and flock after his
cult. How much he will succeed is to be seen.
