I have always been slightly wary of powerful godmen wielding enormous clout over their followers. Instead of inculcating in me a feeling of reverence and faith, they have often given me a certain feeling of intimidation.
This is something vague and difficult to explain, but I sometimes feel something negatively powerful in their persona—something that seems capable of forcing the path of my destiny according to their own idea of life.
I know there are psychic powers. There are almost miraculous and magical intuitive powers that can result from certain tantric practices, meditation techniques, and different yantras, mantras and tantras used for acquiring different types of capabilities.
To me, there is a science behind all this. There is absolutely nothing miraculous in this play of cosmic energy. The potential is already there. There is an inherent quality behind all the traits that get manifested in this interplay of life as we witness it on Earth.
Everything is pre-existing.
If you start observing the smallest microorganisms, insects, birds and animals—some of which have hardly any brain in comparison with us—you find that, on their own little platform of life and living, they are still guided by an extraordinary precision.
From this, I make out that there is an inherent wisdom and knowledge in each and every bit of energy that is going around, and what gets manifested through us is just a portion of it.
So when powerful godmen, tantrics or yogis acquire extraordinary capabilities that attract large numbers of people, institutions begin to build up around them and they gather many followers.
I think it is the result of some kind of realignment of their nervous system and their entire brain. Something offbeat opens up within them, giving them additional capabilities of cognition and perception, extraordinary speaking powers and even the so-called siddhis through which things appear to get manifested at the level of energy itself, without the person physically appearing to do anything.
They seem to acquire the capability to reach towards the roots behind phenomena, actions, words and emotions—to what I perceive as the deeper energetic or quantum field—and from there they can direct things according to their intentions, goals, determination or the way they look at things.
It is something powerful. Accepted. No problem with that.
And naturally, people are awestruck by such capabilities.
A normal householder may efficiently manage his family and control the little system around him. That is his capability.
On a broader platform, a politician or social reformer may manage things and impose his influence upon a larger group of people, ranging from a village to the national level.
There are different domains of life.
Some devote their energies to politics, some to art, some to science, some to business. Depending upon their capabilities and focused attention, they build up an area of influence on the basis of what they are capable of doing.
Similarly, godmen have a different type of capability through which they exercise influence. Their pursuit is different from the ordinary pursuits of common people. They talk of kindness. They talk of love. They talk of peace and harmony.
And just because this appears so different to us—to we people caught up in the struggle for survival, with all its challenges and the consequent emotions of anger, hatred, jealousy and so on—we naturally feel drawn towards them. We respect them. We become disciples and followers.
There is no problem with that either.
At least such an institution appears to be talking about peace and harmony in chaotic and disorderly times.
But I think we should not commit the mistake of taking the godman's version of reality as the ultimate and superiormost perspective available to human beings.
It is another perspective of looking at life—a perspective involving acceptance, faith and hope.
But that does not necessarily make it the ultimate.
We should not take that perspective as the final yardstick and then judge every other human pursuit as inferior.
No.
It is not about inferiority or superiority.
It is about something being different.
It is a dynamic interplay of different characteristics available in Mother Nature, manifesting themselves through different traits. This particular manifestation may represent something that does not come naturally to many of us. It may teach us not to remain so self-centred.
As far as that is concerned, I welcome this perspective.
But I do not take it to be the ultimate point of human achievement, in comparison with which all other perspectives, opinions, goals, aims and ambitions must stand on a lower footing.
No.
Everything is important in its own way.
These are distinct categories, distinct ways through which the same energy is trying to manifest and expand.
When Spiritual Power Becomes Authority
My basic problem with powerful tantrics, godmen and people who build up an enormous cloud of influence around themselves on the basis of their psychic powers is that they sometimes appear to me—and this is entirely my personal opinion—to be tampering with many destinies on the basis of what they themselves perceive to be the ultimate reality.
But in the cosmos, I do not think there is such a simple thing as one ultimate reality available to an individual.
Reality appears infinitely layered to me.
Their perspective is one particular perspective. It may appear beneficial, and it may actually be beneficial for common humanity in many ways.
But nothing can be entirely without its pros and cons.
Powerful tantrics and yogis possessing psychic powers, just like powerful people in other domains of life, can be very categorical and point-blank in their approach. They can develop a rigid, unswerving attitude towards the way things should be managed within the institutions they run.
I have closely observed some institutions built around people believed to possess powerful psychic capabilities acquired through yantra sadhana, tantra sadhana or mantra sadhana.
Such people often carry very strong personalities.
They can also carry a very rigid attitude towards what they deem to be good for the common masses.
I have not always found them adaptable to differing views.
I have seen them becoming angry when counterarguments are put before them. In their own characteristic ways, they can be very dismissive of perspectives that differ from theirs.
They become enormously powerful central forces within the institutions they run.
Of course, the thousands or even millions of followers who gather around them may appear like a family to them. Their institutions may include charitable hospitals, colleges, environmental projects and numerous other activities. It can look like one enormous household.
But somewhere I do not see a fundamental qualitative difference between this and the ordinary householder, at least as far as maintaining a grip upon one's institution or family is concerned.
A common householder is extremely particular, focused and attentive—even self-centred at times—about nurturing the interests of his family.
Similarly, powerful yogis and godmen may display essentially the same attitude towards their much larger spiritual families.
The difference may therefore sometimes be quantitative rather than qualitative.
They are managing a much bigger family.
They may be managing thousands or even millions of people.
But they can remain very adamant about how things should be arranged, how affairs should be managed, and how spiritual tools and techniques should be taught and transmitted.
After a period of time, many of the elements that we witness in other human enterprises can begin creeping into these institutions as well.
You see the same self-interest-driven urge to have more followers.
More influence.
More clout.
Political connections.
I have seen very powerful godmen speaking about divine love and about looking upon all humanity without differentiation, and yet I have also seen some of them eulogizing and singing praises of people belonging to a particular political party.
That gave rise to another reflection in me.
Perhaps it is extremely difficult to completely quit the so-called sins and weaknesses associated with human beings while retaining this human body on Earth.
After all, all of us are human beings.
Some simply have more capabilities.
At the root of it, I feel, a common human being is still functioning and operating.
They too can experience many of the tendencies with which ordinary householders struggle.
They can become angry.
They can experience jealousy.
They can have desires.
They can experience many of the things that arise in ordinary people through their daily exposure to circumstances.
The important difference, perhaps, is that they are less impulsive.
And credit for that may go to their meditation techniques and spiritual disciplines. They have developed the capacity to reflect before reacting.
Basically, it is about mastering the mind.
If an ordinary person has mastered his mind to ten percent, perhaps such a practitioner has carried that mastery much farther.
And obviously somebody who has mastered his mind and taken himself out of the loop of impulsive decisions and behaviour will have a more calculated, precise and almost surgically effective approach while dealing with people and situations, making decisions, handling projects and creating something new.
All in all, we can say that they can become highly effective.
And that effectiveness itself provides the platform from which disciples and followers begin looking up to them as carriers of divinity.
There is nothing wrong with that.
It is the result of their karma—the harvest of their karma.
They have been doing something extraordinarily demanding. They have performed practices requiring enormous investment of energy in all dimensions—mind, body and soul.
They have taken risks.
They may have exposed their bodies to many dangers during their sadhanas.
So whatever comes to them in the form of psychic powers, extrasensory perception or what are described as supernatural capabilities can, within this understanding, be seen as the result of what they have focused upon and what they have been doing throughout their lives.
Tantra and the World of Subtle Energies
There are many stories associated with tantra sadhanas—for example, yogis going into cremation grounds and performing their practices there.
Here I enter a metaphysical understanding of things.
I feel that there may be disembodied entities floating like bubbles of consciousness.
In the traditional elemental framework through which I understand this, such an entity may retain the subtler elements while lacking the complete five-element structure available to a living human body.
Suppose a human being meets a sudden, accidental, tragic and painful death without fulfilling what was meant to be accomplished as his or her prarabdha.
In my understanding, the unit of consciousness leaving such a body may retain a stronger post-death identity than in an ordinary natural death because so much that was meant to be accomplished during that lifetime remains unfulfilled.
I visualize these as floating bubbles carrying strong tendencies.
They may be roaming around almost as different currents exist in the atmosphere.
At most, I feel, they may influence tendencies already existing within us.
Suppose I have a propensity for anger.
If some disembodied entity carrying a similar tendency happens to pass through my energetic system, it might aggravate my primary tendency. I may suddenly become angrier than usual over something very small.
The same may apply to somebody whose dominant attribute is hatred, lust or ambition.
In this metaphysical model, these are strong bubbles of different characteristics looking for a home—trying to get plugged into an energetic system of a similar nature within a living human being possessing all five primary elements.
The disembodied entity is looking for a home, and the complete, living, breathing human body provides such a home.
This is also one way in which I personally try to understand traditional accounts of possession—people appearing to come under the influence of something strange and behaving in ways that would not normally be expected from them.
These are, of course, metaphysical matters operating beyond the plain physical framework through which we ordinarily examine life. I understand them as phenomena at the level of subtle energy.
Within this same understanding, through certain tantra sadhanas a tantric may strengthen his own system by connecting with such disembodied energies.
He provides them, as I visualize it, with a platform of relative stability where they feel somewhat welcomed and find a kind of restfulness.
In return, like obliged guests, they may provide certain capabilities that appear miraculous to ordinary people but, within that metaphysical framework, are simply additional intuitive or psychic faculties.
The tantric or godman may consequently become capable of channelizing many such energies towards shaping circumstances according to his or her intentions.
And that creates power.
The Subtle Nature of Spiritual Power
Such power can enable a person to establish institutions according to what he believes things should be, according to his understanding of what is good and bad.
It allows him to influence people.
People line up behind him.
Institutions get established.
Die-hard supporters emerge.
Some followers may become so intensely identified with the cause that they are prepared to kill or be killed for it.
And over a period of time, you can begin seeing within these institutions many of the same manifestations that appear in any other institution built around power and influence.
The important difference is that here the power is subtle.
In other domains of life, the assertion of power is more direct and straightforward. Therefore, it can more easily be judged, measured and analysed.
But in the spiritual domain there is often a presumption that this particular path and perspective on life is automatically sacrosanct, pure and honest.
So people may stop judging.
Even when authority or power is misused, followers may continue believing that whatever is happening must somehow be good for them—that it is driven by something beyond ordinary human self-interest.
And then a powerful godman may become influential enough to channel the destinies of millions according to his own version of truth.
Is There a Final Truth?
This is where my fundamental disagreement begins.
I do not believe there is one absolute truth that somebody can capture completely and then hand over to everybody else.
Such teachers may speak of the truth they have been seeking and teaching as though it were the final truth.
But I cannot accept that.
If the final truth were completely available to an individual, then what would infinity mean?
Infinity, to me, means that whatever we think, perceive and talk about remains only a fraction of the ultimate truth.
It remains a perspective.
An opinion.
We are still searching for absolute truth, and I sometimes doubt whether we will ever possess it in its totality.
Yet a powerful spiritual authority may present his particular version of life as absolute truth and then drive millions of individual destinies along a path carved out according to that understanding.
To me, this somehow appears to negate one of the fundamental principles of creation itself.
The Right of Consciousness to Explore
Creation appears to me as this beautiful interplay of life and living in which every entity—bodied or disembodied, a blade of grass, an insect, an elephant, a whale or a human being—is participating in creation's exploration of itself through varied and perhaps infinite means and dimensions.
So when a powerful godman or tantric creates one concretely laid-out plan, I can sometimes see individual potential being cut down and levelled out.
People become followers.
They become holders of comparatively minor roles helping sustain the grip of the central authority over the system.
And to me, this represents a curtailment—a check upon the natural flow of somebody's consciousness.
It seems almost as though you are robbing somebody of his or her inherent right to explore destiny on his or her own terms.
A broad boundary has been created.
If you cross that boundary, you are viewed as somebody who has broken the rules.
That, to me, is the basic problem.
It can create a kind of stalemate, a stagnation for millions of individual destinies, forcing them to move according to one particular perspective and one particular version of truth.
But each destiny, each soul and each individual has an inherent right to go searching for his or her own destiny.
Let the individual face the pitfalls on the way.
Let the individual gather and imbibe all the experiences that are possible to a human being.
Because there is a tremendous richness that one gathers on the way.
The Long Detour and the Pathless Path
There is richness in the long detour.
There is richness in the soul path.
There is richness in the pathless path that one pursues on one's own.
It is redolent with treasure houses.
It is full of pain.
It is full of agony.
But it is full of ecstatic highs as well.
When somebody begins following a powerful tantric or godman, however, there can be an expectation of security:
I will receive a properly laid-out plan.
I will have security.
I will have safety.
I will have the convenience of not being exposed to all the hazards of the journey.
I will be safe.
But this very assurance of safety can itself become a big check dam—a boundary fixed around the individual, making him or her part of a closed system that no longer allows spontaneous interaction with the uncertainties of life.
And that may stop individual consciousness from fully blossoming.
It might have blossomed in so many different ways had it taken its own path.
That is why, to me, Mother Existence—this creation itself—is God, the Creator.
And whatever is here, from the smallest manifestation to the largest, seems to be pushing each and every iota and atom towards a different kind of blossoming.
Perhaps that freedom to blossom differently is itself one of the deepest beauties of creation.
