Naomi Canton writes in Hindustan Times, dated October 28, 2007, and after reading her first-person account of India, there is a trigger that pushes me to write a response.
Dear Miss Canton,
I read your first-person account of India, HT, October 28, 2007.
The exotic East has always appeared alluring to the street-smart, practical, adventurous West. Maybe for a long time, the East, and especially India, served as an extensive museum abounding with marvellous antiques.
But then globalization is such a strong force. It is a great leveller, like a mighty bulldozer. It has levelled up the pleasant variants of sweet, sweet differentials blooming in different nooks and corners of this world.
This mighty wave of monoculture will perhaps eventually end up painting the entire planet in the same commonly accepted shining colours of capitalism, cars, ultra-modern utilities, language, lifestyle, etc.
The process seems irreversible.
The globalization train is being led by the West. We Indians, and practically the entire East, have always been good passengers on this train to modernity. We might squabble among ourselves, closeted in our noisy compartments, but when it comes to the journey itself, all of us seem to have made up our minds to follow the planet-chugging rigid line of steel.
It is no wonder, then, that you found India, at least the urban centres, emerging as the Xerox copy of ultra-modern cities in the West.
Definitely, the boom and bustle of the cities' urban economy has burst through the ceiling. Indian cities are buzzing with swarming tentacles, immense stores of pleasantries, but also sufferings and even miseries in their corridors.
Yet these are islands of prosperity, and these are an eyesore to the famished, historically spread-out masses across the length and breadth of the country.
Now things have acquired such a shape that after enjoying world-class facilities in an urban centre, one moves just a few dozen kilometres into the countryside, into the tent of reality, and one is awestruck by the contrast in the fates of the classes and the masses.
The churning between vertically surging classes and the horizontally slumbering masses is happening across sharp, clearly defined angles.
If the towers of prosperity rise too high on a little space, with a tiny section of affluent people in them, then there is every danger that their weight might become the symbol of envy, exploitation and misery to those who live under the towers' underprivileged shadows.
I am not over-exaggerating the danger, knowing fully well that the process of capitalization is as real as any other natural force. But the way the haves are being enabled by the modern system to pile on and on to the slim towers of prosperity, in blind contrast to the base-level, earth-clinging, dirt-licking humanity around them, they might, after some time, having abandoned all hopes of a rise for themselves, get on with the task of digging into the foundations of the towers of prosperity.
So the shining slim towers need to broaden their bases in order to sustain themselves, and consequently accommodate more and more humans in the surrounding, supporting, lesser towers around them.
I do write, or rather try to write, and quite simply I'm seeking readers.
Once you write, good or bad, you also want to be read. Seems natural.
I have written a novel. I just send it to anyone whom I think might read it as a piece of work, throwing some light on some hidden surface.
I am forwarding it to your email box.
Hope you will enjoy the piece of write-up.
