I remember a talk I had with an
elderly American Buddhist woman at Mcleodganj many years ago. A very ardent
follower of Buddhism she had spent decades in India. The outer bearing,
including the religious clothes, was pretty impressive. But she looked very
stiff, cautious, even stern. I felt it was like someone going on the fathomless
path with lots of calculations; following the principleless path with lots of
principles. She stiffened even more as we shook hands. I could feel it clearly.
It was a wooden hand that I held. I tried to convince myself of the loftiness
of her soul because she had been on the formal path of religion for so long.
But I couldn’t feel the warmth, kindness and smile in her persona. Maybe these
emanated and I was too coarse or not sensitive enough to feel that.
I can still clearly remember the
glint of pride in her eyes when she told me that she had spent years in sadhna and had been a celibate since the
age of forty-five. She had spent a few years at Pune as well. The mention of
Pune instantly brought great Osho to my mind. ‘So did you stay at Osho commune
at Pune?’ I asked innocently. She recoiled with horror as if it was an insult
to her hardcore, austere tapasya. She
shook her hands and head in a vehement ‘no’ as if staying at Osho’s place would
have meant a sin. O thou great Osho, misinterpreted so much for all your
elaboration of the naked truth as a means to nail down the illusions! Before
mentioning Osho I should have remembered that she had been a celibate for at
least two and half decades. It was the crest jewel of her path of renunciation.
But the great Osho accepted the presence of sex in the human body and talked of
its transformation instead of suppression for everlasting joy. So no wonder the
celibate sadhak jumped like a rocket
at the mention of Osho.
Well, sex or no sex, if you turn
wooden and suspicious even at the age of seventy by the touch of a man of the
age of your son, it simply means you have missed a crucial link to liberation.
If the suppression of sex has stiffened you, made you austere, not given you a
genuine smile, sweetness of temperament or ease of being then one may need to
revise the fundamentals of one’s faith.
In contrast I remember a woman
from a neighboring village. A very beautiful peasant woman famed for her
illustrious beauty and untamed sense of freedom regarding the basic instincts.
The lore of her beauty and its exciting spin-offs had reached my ears. There
were far more happy and joyful men, and very few jealous ones, having shared
the unbridled sense of feminine charms flowing from her persona. There was a
joke that she would occupy the best chambers in heaven for having made so many
men happy.
Mother usually won’t allow us to
go to the fields, taking all the responsibilities on herself. We the pampered
ones had the easiest task in the world—studies. Mother must not have been
feeling well that day; otherwise I won’t have been there in the fields to get
fodder. I was struggling to load the bale of fodder on my bike and failing at
it miserably with my bookish hands. The beautiful peasant woman knew me because
we shared fields across the village boundary. She walked quickly from a
distance. That was the first time I saw her from close quarters. Her famed
beauty was no exaggeration. She came smilingly and with a singular effort put
the heavy fodder bale on the bike and tied it firmly without even putting the
littlest strain on her face. What strength! She must have heard about my
bookish ways. ‘These soft hands aren’t for such rough work masterji!’ she took my hand in her rough, peasant woman hands. I
will never forget that touch. It was humane, strong, kind, palpable, supportive
and understanding. And that friendly smile. And that naughty glint in the eyes.
Beautiful was that color of mellowness and acceptance of life in its basic
terms on her face. Wonderful was that strength of character in her strong farming
hands. ‘And this is the woman the critics malign so much for her sexuality!’ I
thought. Shyly I thanked her. She laughed and walked away to continue with her
work.
The wooden touch and a full of
life, sympathetic touch! The sum and summary is that beyond the debate of sex
or no sex, it’s the warmth of our touch, the kindness in our eyes, an accepting
smile on our lips that’s more important. If celibacy leaves you wooden and
stiff in the old age then I don’t think the Gods would love you for that. And
if full compliance with the basic instinct gives you a kind heart, genuine
smile and ease of being then the Gods won’t hate you for that.
Since we are talking about the
touch of hands, it won’t be misplaced to mention His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s
touch. When you hold His hand it seems the softest like a new-born baby. You
don’t feel the slightest rigidity, tension, dis-ease or stiffness. It’s almost like
a soft brush that a gentle breeze has with a rose petal. You feel divinity in
that soft touch. Long live His Holiness!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Kindly feel free to give your feedback on the posts.