A Walk over the Peanut
Husks
The
month of December in Delhi is not just about aggravating respiratory symptoms
and phlegmatic fountains, it is also about peanuts, the poor man’s almond.
Sonia-push-pulled-drawn-rolled UPA 2 has been enjoying power for the last six
months. For the year 2009 just a week left to survive with its bag of good and
bad. The Prime-Minister-in-Waiting having failed twice, there is high chance he
might never fulfil his dream. Much as Advani might try to keep himself
physically fit in his eighties, to survive, to keep his dream alive; it’s
Manmohan the mask man who wields power for Sonia, his face remaining the same
despite all criticisms and loads of insults in the media. More than governing
they seem to be grooming Rahul for the chair sometime in the future: The
aristocracy surviving in its 21st century avatar in the world’s
largest democracy.
The
road-spitters, peanut-munchers and hunched-defecators have given the motley mix
of ideologies embaled in the box of pseudo-secularism another chance to rule
their destinies. The UPA gang clamours too loudly, ‘Wolf, wolf! It will tear
you apart. The atrocities will surpass even Hitler’s genocide.’ So they stay
away from the wolf and take shelter with the non-wolf, which has no teeth to
bite, but enough brains to plunder public resources unprecedently. Its
constituents having come to an agreement not to block anybody’s progress to get
more zeroes at the end of their Swiss bank accounts.
The
grand old man of contemporary politics stands robbed of his chance to rule
India. Even in his milder avatar, begotten after praising Jinnah, he is not
acceptable. Muslims wouldn’t accept the BJPwallah
even if he reads kalima and turns
Muslims himself; and Hindus do not like this curious unrecognisable mixture of
saffron and green. So the grand old man, with Hitler’s whiter version of his
moustache, harbinger of a not so bloody revolution, a milder one and acceptable
as per the national and international standards, stands mute and meek. Not
caring much about a Muslim bullet, he seems more scared of a knee-rattling hit
by the stick held by Khakhi-shorts-clad
angry persona.
The
RSS will not spare him and let him go unpunished. He has to put his claim down;
they might go for a better choice now to fit their dream of a nationalistic,
resurgent India. However the pain of the patriarch bowing out is overshadowed
by the symbolism of a concept: The concept of being democratic in its
management. There is a contrast. The fissure between the BJP and the Congress.
There are more democratic traces in the former’s mode of operation. The latter
just clinging to a particular family, and the former putting down a patriarch
who almost singlehandedly formulated the present avatar of the big national
party. All its ideological designs still under the carpet, but at least in
letter the BJP seems to have paid a huge respect to the Indian masses by asking
Advani to go. Can the Congress do the same to the Gandhi-Nehru family if they
also fail twice consequently?
The
Congress begins and ends with the famed foremost political family of India. The
Nehru family is virtually the definition of Congress. Peoples’ emotions have
been put on a stranglehold by erecting a well-functioning system of loyalists
ever-oiling the causes of the first political family. Accept it or not, it’s
impossible to think of Congress without the Gandhi-Nehru clan. What Advani did
for the resurgence of the BJP was no way short of Nehru’s efforts to make Congress
a family set-up post independence. As far as the efforts are concerned Advani
has been as great as Nehru in erecting a national level political structure.
But still when it comes to the BJP, it’s possible to smell its chances beyond the
Advani clan. It can be drawn as a positive for the Indian democracy. Now the
issue just trickles to the question, is it possible to imagine the same fate
for the Gandhis? Not as long as the Congress we are acquainted with!